Sure, like I care, right?
Well, actually I do a little. I want to see, for one thing, how hypocritical this can get. As a number of people have pointed out re the 2008 presidential hopefuls, for instance, this bit of math seems startling:
Hillary Clinton - married once.
Barach Obama - married once.
John Edwards - married once.
And just for fun...
Al Gore - married once (but not running... so far).
Then we have:
Rudolph Giuliani - married three times.
John McCain - married two times.
Mitt Romney - married once (his Mormonism won't play well with the CR, though).
Newt Gingrich - married three times. (Nonetheless, he's apparently throwing his hat into the presidential ring.)
So... counting Al Gore who probably isn't running (but maybe should?) and Newt who probably is running (but maybe shouldn't?), the totals look like this:
Democrats = 4 candidates = 4 marriages.
Republicans = 4 candidates = 9 marriages (and in Gingrich's confession to evangelical guru James Dobson, he also confessed to an affair during the Bill Clinton scandal!)
A subtext in this is, of course, who is backing who. McCain is disgusted with Dobson, and Dobson has said basically he won't vote for McCain. So one is left wondering if Dobson is attempting to "rehabilitate" Gingrich as his own choice for the Republican nomination. Don't know... but it is nifty to note that though Giuliani (as Land claims) is not only of dubious character and pro-gun control, Gingrich will likely join McCain as pro-NRA. Guns are a Freudian representation of what? Oh... morality! I forgot.
But will other Christian Right spokesmen split their voting block up between Newt Gingrich and, as the Southern Baptists' Richard Land seems to have done, McCain? What would be truly fascinating is if Giuliani holds onto his current lead in early polls, and the Christian Right has to decide between him and whoever the Democrats nominate. Because here's the thing... not to back someone means the Christian Right is no longer a major player in the power wars. And after Dubya's success, largely because of them, I suspect the CR just won't be able to take the road of non-involvement.
This could be a season where all sorts of things, morally and otherwise, become clear.
1 comment:
It makes you wonder how they (the Christian Right)are supporting any current Republican candidates on family value issues as none of the Republican folks with the exception of Romney are particularly family men! I guess you are embraced by the Christian Right if you agree with them "somewhat" on politics (is that so, huh?) or more importantly, I suppect, if they feel they can exert influence politically on the Republican Party! Power corrupts and certainly makes for an interesting election.
Thr right will have to broaden their agenda to find support for any of these Republican candidates as none are particularly pro- fidelity, prolife or anti-gay rights? (It will be interesting if the "non-christian cultist" ends up their poster child.) What's left to agree on is telling as you pointed out, GUNS! Hmmm, how typical of the unredeemed male psyche! Redemption by Guns!
Post a Comment